Civic Tech

OpenAI faces copyright lawsuit in India

This could influence the future legal landscape regarding copyright in India.

OpenAI is currently facing a significant copyright lawsuit in India, initiated by the Federation of Indian Publishers alongside various international publishers. This legal action, filed in New Delhi, targets OpenAI for allegedly using copyrighted literary works without authorization to train its AI model, ChatGPT.

The lawsuit includes prominent publishers such as Bloomsbury, Penguin Random House, Cambridge University Press, and several Indian publishers like Rupa Publications and S. Chand and Co.

Key Details of the Lawsuit

– Filing Date and Court: The lawsuit was filed in December 2024 and is set to be heard by a judge on January 28, 2025.
– Legal Claims: The Federation argues that OpenAI’s operations in India should adhere to Indian copyright laws. They contend that the AI’s ability to generate book summaries and extracts from unlicensed sources poses a threat to their sales and intellectual property rights.
– Demands: The plaintiffs are seeking a court order to prevent OpenAI from accessing their copyrighted content. They also request that if OpenAI does not wish to negotiate licensing agreements, it should delete any datasets used for AI training that include their works.

Broader Context

This lawsuit is part of a growing trend where various authors, news outlets, and media companies globally are challenging AI firms over copyright infringement. OpenAI is already involved in a separate lawsuit with ANI (Asian News International), which accuses the company of using its content without permission. Additionally, high-profile figures like Indian billionaires Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani have joined the legal fray, filing a suit against OpenAI for similar allegations related to digital news content.

Implications

The outcome of these lawsuits could significantly influence the future legal landscape regarding AI and copyright in India. A ruling against OpenAI could impose stricter regulations on how AI companies source and utilize copyrighted materials, while a favorable ruling for OpenAI might redefine the boundaries of “fair use” in the context of generative AI technologies.